uweigand added a comment. In D109362#3000284 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362#3000284>, @anirudhp wrote:
> In D109362#2999688 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362#2999688>, @uweigand > wrote: > >> Looking at the common code parts, it seems the behavior of MM_GOFF is >> actually identical to MM_ELF. Is this correct? If so, do we really need >> a different format type here? > > At a future point, we will be changing the local and global prefixes. At that > point we would still need a separate `MM_GOFF` field. I feel it would be a > bit better to enforce it from now itself. I see. Is there a reason why we cannot use the "correct" prefixes to begin with? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
