aaron.ballman added a comment. In D69764#2997910 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2997910>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> I think the relevance of Left/Right East/West as a setting is less > important, as its more about an ordering, allowing some tokens to go to the > Left and some to the Right of the "type" > > QualifierAlignment: Custom > QualifierOrder: [ inline, static, type, const, volatile, restrict ] > > While I currently include the Left/Right for some form of completeness I sort > of feel i should kill them before we landing this, as I think even my > defaults are a little subjective. (unless we can get concencus), hence I > don't feel the need to bring back up the Left/Right/East/West debate. If its > still a problem later we can add them. +1, I think this style of configuration is easier to reason about than left/right, east/west, before/after, etc because it's an explicit ordering. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
