curdeius added a comment. In D69764#2996365 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2996365>, @steveire wrote:
> FYI - there's nothing "anti-inclusive" about East/West. Thank you for your comment. Personally I don't think that the question of not using East/West is whether these terms are inclusive or not. It's more about being straight to the point, not multiplying multiple options (clang-format has lots of them already). Moreover, Left/Right is IMO universally understood (we have left-to-right or right-to-left writing, left/right margin and so on, these words seem to be more popular in typography-related contexts). East/West is on the other hand not that universal and often misunderstood. It also adds an unnecessary cognitive charge, because one needs to translate it to left/right in their head anyway. Tangentially, the left part of my screen is not necessarily on the west... My 2 cents. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
