ahatanak added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20407#439951, @rjmccall wrote:
> The C standard is poorly-written in this area, but I think it would be > reasonable for CheckFunctionReturnType to just silently remove _Atomic. (You > will not be able to just re-use your new method there; removing other > qualifiers is not acceptable, I'm afraid.) Do you mean I should fix those cases in this patch too? http://reviews.llvm.org/D20407 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
