ahatanak added a comment. I've managed to remove _Atomic from the types of the return and parameter of getter and setter functions in my new patch.
I'm not sure how I should handle typedefs though. If I had the following typedef, typedef _Atomic(_Bool) AtomicBool, would it be OK to desugar the typedef and then remove _Atomic? I'm not sure this is always correct because dusugaring typedefs will remove the attributes attached to them that might be important too. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20407 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
