werat added a comment.

> Hi! Thanks for the patch, it makes sense to me! Honestly, I think having the 
> open shadow is maybe not the best way to solve this (please feel free to let 
> me know if there are reasons it would be better), maybe spell it out 
> explicitly (there aren't that many cases of open)?

It seemed a bit tedious to spell it out explicitly everywhere, but you're 
right, not a script of this size it's not a problem. The benefit of a global 
shadow is that nobody will use regular `open` accidentally, but I think the 
risk of that is relatively low.

> Also, hm... Do we really need these? It's safe to remove those, this 
> shouldn't be a problem, I think.

I don't think using non-ASCII quotes was intentional and we can definitely 
remove them. But future-proofing this script will avoid this problem in the 
future.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106792/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106792

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to