hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. In D106577#2897588 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577#2897588>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D106577#2897522 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577#2897522>, @jyknight > wrote: > >> I'm not sure we should be populating this. >> >> The _value_ is determined by what libc supports, so it probably needs to be >> left up to libc to define it. > > Why is the value determined by what libc supports? The definition from the > standard is: > > If this symbol is defined, then every character in the Unicode required > set, when stored in an > object of type wchar_t, has the same value as the short identifier of that > character. > > That doesn't seem to imply anything about the library, just the size of > `wchar_t`. Every character in the Unicode required set encoded in what way? To say that such a character is stored in an object of type `wchar_t` means that interpreting the `wchar_t` yields that stored character. Methods to determining the interpretation of the stored `wchar_t` value include locale-sensitive functions such as `wcstombs` (and thus is tied to libc). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
