aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20428#434420, @hintonda wrote:
> I can already catch all of these cases, but I can't catch this one, will this > catch it too? > > void g(void (*fp)(void) throw()) throw(); > ^^^^^^^ > > > Actually, I can catch it, but I haven't been able to create an ASTMatcher > that will only include FunctionDecl's -- even using functionDecl() still > returns all Decl's, not just FunctionDecl's. Yes, this information is also tracked as part of my patch. I've added a few more test cases for it, thank you! Assuming that @rsmith thinks my direction is reasonable for tracking source information, I strongly prefer to gate your patch on this one. Your custom parser may work fine, but I don't think it should be required since we already have this information from the real parser. Might as well thread the information through so that it can be used by tooling. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20428 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
