wenlei added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/pseudo-probe.c:4
 // RUN: %clang -### -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling -fdebug-info-for-profiling %s 
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CONFLICT
+// RUN: %clang -### -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling 
-funique-internal-linkage-names %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=YESPROBE
+// RUN: %clang -### -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling 
-fno-unique-internal-linkage-names %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NONAME
----------------
hoy wrote:
> wenlei wrote:
> > how do we test unique linkage name is implied with probe on?
> These two test lines below corresponding to line 1 in the test, which show 
> that -funique-internal-linkage-names is passed to cc1.
> 
> ```
> 
> // YESPROBE: -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling
> // YESPROBE: -funique-internal-linkage-names
> ```
> 
> The change being made here is a driver change, so a driver test should be 
> good.
The change is about making `-funique-internal-linkage-names` implied, but the 
test specified that switch explicitly. I was asking how to test the "implicit" 
part? Not sure what line 4 is testing wrt to this change. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106193/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106193

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to