rsmith added a comment. Would we benefit from any more test coverage for the `static_assert` side of this paper, or is our (formerly wrong and now correct) behavior already well-covered by existing tests? (Similarly for `explicit(bool)`, do we already have good test coverage for the distinction between "contextually converted constant expression of type `bool`" and the various other possible rules?)
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105127/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105127 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
