xbolva00 added a comment.

>> Would it be fine to revert this for now to work out the kinks?

I dont think. This is a known problem, not caused by this patch, just exposed. 
You can search bugzilla for it, simply, if there is an UB, llvm should emit a 
“ret”.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96418/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96418

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to