urnathan marked 5 inline comments as done.
urnathan added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:12370
// If we weren't able to compute a valid scope, it might validly be a
// dependent class scope or a dependent enumeration unscoped scope. If
// we have a 'typename' keyword, the scope must resolve to a class type.
----------------
bruno wrote:
> Does this comment needs update?
I don't think so. 'if we weren't able to compute a scope' is never true for the
using-enum case (and neither is 'if we have a typename keyword'. what is it
that you're finding confusing here?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
