kbobyrev accepted this revision.
kbobyrev added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Good point, thanks!

I wonder if this can somehow make the experience worse in _some_ specific cases 
but I can't think of anything on top of my mind, so this should be all good.



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/remote/server/Server.cpp:152
+    if (HasMore)
+      log("[public] Limiting result size for Lookup request.");
     LookupReply LastMessage;
----------------
nit (here and elsewhere): maybe add something like `(requested X, sending Y)` 
to the message for clarity. I don't expect this to be common anyway so probably 
verbosity isn't an issue here.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D101914/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D101914

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to