rnk added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20180#427840, @alexfh wrote:
> `inline` seems to be completely redundant here. Can you try removing it and > running whatever build configurations were failing without > http://reviews.llvm.org/D20182? My bad, it's explicit function template specializations that need to be marked inline when in headers. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20180 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
