phosek added a comment. In D101479#2741202 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479#2741202>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> In D101479#2740895 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479#2740895>, @phosek wrote: > >> On other platforms the decision whether to use static or shared is >> controlled by `-static-libstdc++`, does CL have a similar flag or shall we >> support `-static-libstdc++` in MSVC driver as well? > > Hmm, well contrary to how `-static-libstdc++` works otherwise (you only need > it while linking), you'd need to define > `-D_LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS` everwhere when compiling, if > libc++ defaults to DLL linkage but you'd want to use a static version instead. > > Repeating the question - does the driver really need to know or care? Thanks > to the autolinking directive in libc++ headers, the driver shouldn't need to > explicitly link against the libc++ library at all? I'd be fine with that. Is that what CL does as well? Do we still need the `-libpath:` for the linker to find the library? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
