ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D100739#2727808 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739#2727808>, @ychen wrote:
> In D100739#2718528 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739#2718528>, @ChuanqiXu > wrote: > >> In D100739#2718514 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739#2718514>, @ychen wrote: >> >>> Oh, right now C++ coroutine standard is written in the way that the aligned >>> new is not searched by the frontend. The limitation will be lifted in C++23 >>> (hopefully). >> >> I see. I am curious about the relationship of compiler implementation and >> language standard now. For example, Clang/LLVM implement coroutine before it >> becomes standard. The point I curious about is that should Clang/LLVM >> implement based on proposals accepted only? > > Not a C++ language expert myself. But I think a proposal does not have to be > formally accepted to kick-start the implementation (as long as the overall > design is decided and the proposal is very likely to be accepted). I see. I am still prefer to use the aligned allocator to solve the problems, although you and other reviewers prefer to use the over aligned frame. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
