ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D100739#2717582 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739#2717582>, @rjmccall wrote:
> That's not really what I meant, no. I meant it would be better to find a way > to use an allocator that promises to return a well-aligned value when > possible. We've talked about this before; that will require the C++ committee > to update the design. I had a question. Does this mean we can't use aligned allocator until the C++ committee update the wording? For example, I know Clang/LLVM implement coroutine before it becomes the standard. I mean is it possible to use aligned-allocator to solve the problem here? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
