SaurabhJha added a comment. Hey, I should mention that I am new to clang/llvm. My below thoughts could be wrong.
> IIRC, making C-style casts work correctly in C++ will actually be easier if > you make one of the specialized casts do it; I'd say go ahead and do it in > `static_cast`. > > Casts in C use basically a completely different code path. Okay, then I think I will focus on static casts and C style casts for later. They use different functions, `CheckStaticCast` and `CheckCStyleCast` respectively and implementing static casts in matrix must involve change in `CheckStaticCast` and the function it calls. > Right, vector casts are their own unfortunate thing which we don't want to > semantically emulate. > > What code do you want to get out of this? Are there e.g. vectorized > float->double conversions we can use, or is the operation basically doomed to > break the matrix apart and put it back together again? I think because matrices are vectors underneath, we should try vectorised conversions. Thoughts? Saurabh Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99037/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99037 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
