On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Michael Miller via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> michael_miller added inline comments.
>
> ================
> Comment at: clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp:31
> @@ +30,3 @@
> +// Convenience utility to get a RecordDecl from a QualType.
> +const RecordDecl *getCanonicalRecordDecl(const QualType &Type) {
> +  if (const auto *RT = Type.getCanonicalType()->getAs<RecordType>())
> ----------------
> alexfh wrote:
> > Is `getCanonicalType()` important here? Did you try using
> `QualType::getAsCXXRecordDecl()`?
> Probably not but I didn't try it. I just moved the previous function up to
> the top so I didn't have to forward declare it.
>
> One thing I'm simply unsure of is whether it's possible to get a
> RecordDecl that's not a CXXRecordDecl in C++ code. It seems like the answer
> is no but that might be another reason to keep it as is if I'm wrong about
> that...


It's fine to assume that all RecordDecls will be CXXRecordDecls in C++
code.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to