martong marked an inline comment as done. martong added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporterVisitors.h:119-124 +/// Attempts to add visitors to track an RValue expression back to its point of +/// origin. Works similarly to trackExpressionValue, but accepts only RValues. +void trackRValueExpression(const ExplodedNode *N, const Expr *E, + PathSensitiveBugReport &R, + TrackingKind TKind = TrackingKind::Thorough, + bool EnableNullFPSuppression = true); ---------------- steakhal wrote: > It is supposed to be called by the `trackExpressionValue()`. > Why do we expose this function then? I was thinking about that maybe some Checkers could explicitly want to track RValues only. On the other hand, maybe it just complicates the public API. Anyway, I'd like to hear what other people say about this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99344/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99344 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
