dblaikie added a comment. In D99121#2649546 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99121#2649546>, @ruiling wrote:
>> No, sorry I don't - I ran out of steam after the initial work, and haven't >> been able to get back into it. A few folks have picked up my slack in the >> last year or two & made some incremental progress. >> >> It'd be good to tag any workarounds somehow (I don't know how, exactly) to >> be sure they're cleaned up as things are sorted out. >> >> Long and the short of it: If these bugs matter to you, probably not worth >> waiting for the general fix (but more help would be appreciated if you >> wanted to work on the long term solution) & workarounds are probably >> reasonable. > > Sounds we still need a long way to get there? Do we think the patch > acceptable as a short-term solution? Guess it's a tradeoff. Doesn't look like a load of code/complexity. - but equally, does it provide much value? Or is it enough to know it can eventually be addressed in a more general manner? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99121/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99121 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
