vsavchenko added a comment. In D86465#2640687 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465#2640687>, @steakhal wrote:
> Given that it did not change any reports in our testbench it seems to be safe > to land it. > > It clearly improves the API significantly, so I'm not opposing. > Really good work @vsavchenko. Thanks 😊 > PS: If should support `_ExtInt`s as well, even if they are not too common. > Please try to fill this gap, before you push your changes. I do have a bit of a struggle here. This is a unit-test and thus should be compiled for all supported architecture by all of the supported compilers. Is there a `__has_feature` or something for me to check if `_ExtInt` can be used? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
