jroelofs added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19920#421173, @rmaprath wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19920#421145, @jroelofs wrote: > > > Wouldn't this break cross unwinding? > > > I wasn't aware of cross unwinding, I think you are referring to [1]. Thanks > for the pointer. > > Would it make sense to support a libunwind build that only supports native > unwinding? For baremetal (embedded) applications, I don't think cross > unwinding (if I understand it correctly) makes a lot of sense. > > Thanks! > > / Asiri > > [1] http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html#section_4 Yeah, that's what I'm referring to. I have no idea if it's currently working or not, but *adding* a build mode that only supports native unwinding sounds like a good idea. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19920 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
