MaskRay added a comment. If the end goal is to provide a complete libc, and currently the usage is expected to shadow system libc (this has to be very careful, as I don't know how shadowing some important components like pthread shall work), perhaps the name should convey this point?
================ Comment at: clang/test/Driver/linux-ld.c:235 // CHECK-CLANG-LD-STATIC-PIE-NOPIE: error: cannot specify 'nopie' along with 'static-pie' // +// RUN: %clang -experimental-link-llvmlibc -no-canonical-prefixes %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 \ ---------------- Empty `// ` actually makes browsing difficult and we generally don't do this for other tests. You can omit them. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97736/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97736 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
