jrtc27 added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/m68k-sub-archs.cpp:1
+// RUN: %clang -### -target m68k-unknown-linux -mcpu=68000 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck 
--check-prefix=CHECK-MX00 %s
+// RUN: %clang -### -target m68k-unknown-linux -mcpu=m68000 %s 2>&1 | 
FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-MX00 %s
----------------
glaubitz wrote:
> jrtc27 wrote:
> > jrtc27 wrote:
> > > Why MX00 etc?
> > I think you misunderstood my comment. Having CHECK-A, CHECK-B, CHECK-C etc 
> > is fine. My issue was with the MX00/MX10/MX20 suffix that makes no sense to 
> > me; it's M68000/M68010/etc, X normally stands for a variable, but the 0 is 
> > always constant. M00/M10/etc, M000/M010/etc and M68000/M68010/M68020 would 
> > seem like more sensible names (also without the M would be fine), but MX00 
> > looks like it's trying to match M000/M100/M200/etc, which is not the case.
> From what I can see, I would say it's supposed to represent the "680" in 
> "M68020", for example.
Yeah, I just don't think it's particularly intuitive, especially when the 
backend was originally intended to be called M680x0, the use of an X to stand 
in for different things in very similar situations is confusing.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88394/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88394

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to