aaron.ballman added a comment. In D88220#2573018 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220#2573018>, @aaronpuchert wrote:
> In D88220#2571911 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220#2571911>, @amccarth wrote: > >> Would anyone object to allowing the option but silently ignoring it, at >> least for a transition period? > > No objection from me. Nor from me. >> Was there prior notice of this option being deprecated? > > I don't think we have a way to deprecate warning flags. We could perhaps put > something under `-Woption-ignored`. > > @aaron.ballman, what do you think about this? We don't have a loud way of deprecating them (that I'm aware of). We usually rely on the release notes to say something, but we didn't do that here. As for using `-Woption-ignored`... I am not certain we want it directly under that flag, but it may make sense as a subgroup of `-Woption-ignored`. e.g., I can imagine a use case where someone wants to silence that they're using a deprecated flag (so their -Wx builds continue to compile) but still wants to be warned when they use a option that's ignored for other reasons. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
