aaronpuchert added a comment.

In D88220#2566628 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220#2566628>, @Quuxplusone wrote:

> My concern was more that I'm much less of an expert on Clang than "most of 
> us."

Understood, but Clang tries to closely follow the C++ standard in its 
implementation, and I'd say that the APIs used in this change do exactly what 
one would naively think they do. And we haven't introduced any new functions so 
we can't even discuss where to put them.

I'm sometimes reading up about implicit moving but the area seemed a bit in 
flux so I was hoping for things to settle down before I start to remember what 
might soon be obsolete. Let's hope this settles it.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to