Anastasia added a comment.

In D96771#2571582 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771#2571582>, @awarzynski wrote:

> Hi @Anastasia , thank you for working on this!
>
> IIUC, this patch introduces:
>
> - new input types: `TY_CLCXX` and `TY_CLCXXHeader`
> - new language: `OpenCLCXX`
>
> Based on the attached test, this is only to remove the need for 
> `-cl-std=clc++`. Do you expect any other benefits of introducing the above 
> ^^^?

This is only the initial patch and for the moment the primary goal is to remove 
the need for the flag at least from the clang perspective.

> And are you planning to to update the OpenCL C++ tests not to use  
> `-cl-std=clc++`?

I was not sure about this. I just dislike the fact that moving files in the 
repo complicates the commit history lookup so I was not sure if the renaming 
was good or bad thing. Do you have any suggestions?

I was thinking to introduce as a guideline that the new tests should definitely 
use the new extension though.

I find the way driver is setup for the languages quite different so I was 
wondering if we have any guidelines?



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/Types.cpp:163
 
-bool types::isOpenCL(ID Id) { return Id == TY_CL; }
+bool types::isOpenCL(ID Id) {
+  switch (Id) {
----------------
awarzynski wrote:
> This is not used.
This is used in the patch that is planned to be committed hopefully soon: 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96515


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to