mantognini added a comment. I feel this would be a valuable addition, indeed. Only a minor question from me.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/Types.cpp:265 .Case("cl", TY_CL) + .Case("clcpp", TY_CLCXX) .Case("cp", TY_CXX) ---------------- I'm not sure we want that -- I'm actually fine if we don't -- but I see below `c++` and `cxx` are supported in addition to `cpp`. Should we therefore also have `clc++` and `clcxx` as file valid extensions for consistency? I wonder what the general opinion is. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits