MaskRay added a comment. In D93952#2475762 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952#2475762>, @atmnpatel wrote:
> Ah I see, I was never able to find clear documentation on what exactly the > -cc1 flag does other than the conceptual description. This should fix it > right? -cc1 options are implementation details and are unstable. Driver options need to be more stable and usually cannot be removed. Ah I forgot that the driver option's default `-f[no-]discard-value-names` is dependent on `-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS`. Can you also update the summary of this Diff and add a file-level comment to the test? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
