fhahn added a comment. In D93952#2475526 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952#2475526>, @atmnpatel wrote:
> I can't say that I know with any certainty, I'm too inexperienced. This > failure was missed by me locally, the pre-merge bot, and by most of the > buildbots other than the ones I mentioned above. I have no idea under what > configuration of CMake options will clang not emit this particular case of a > label for a BB. The problem is that this test is using `%clang` instead of `%clang_cc1`. Executing `clang` directly will pass `-fdiscard-value-names` when built with release mode; all blocks/values will be numbered, instead of explicitly named. It would be better to update the test to use `%clang_cc1`, to make it independent on flags passed depending on configuration of clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93952 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
