ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D91245#2454504 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245#2454504>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> Aside: Would you be prepared to take a look at D34225: [clang-format] Teach > clang-format how to handle C++ coroutines <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34225> > which is pretty much been abandoned, and see if there is anything there that > might help the co_routinues support? I think the test cases in D34225: [clang-format] Teach clang-format how to handle C++ coroutines <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34225> are rare in our codes. It is a little strange to write `co_return (43)` instead of `co_return 43`. And the grammar `for co_await (auto x : range)` is used rarely. I think both of them are defects of clang-format while they are really rare in actual environments. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
