ChuanqiXu added a comment.

In D91245#2437741 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245#2437741>, @Quuxplusone wrote:

> Peanut gallery says: It seems to me that your root problem here is that 
> `co_yield` is not being recognized by the parser as a keyword, and so you're 
> seeing e.g. `co_yield* p;` the same way you'd see `CoYield* p;`.
> But in that case, you should also be seeing `co_yield -1;` formatted as 
> `co_yield - 1;` the same way you'd see `CoYield - 1;`.
> Is it possible that you're not using the right (C++20) language mode? (OTOH, 
> see D69144 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69144>, D69180 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69180>, which //also// didn't concern themselves 
> with language modes. I don't understand why not.)
>
> Could you please re-upload the diff with context (i.e. `git show -U999`)?

Yes, it looks like that `co_yield` is not being recognized as keywords. I use 
the `Auto` for Standard attribute in `.clang-format` config file. And `co*` 
would be recognized as keywords. From my point of view, I first find that the 
keyword `return`  was processed specifically in the line 1962 in 
`TokenAnnotator.cpp` which recognize `return` as Unary Operator. So I choose to 
recognize `co*` keywords as Unary Operators to solve the format problem.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to