Anastasia added a comment. In the RFC it has been discussed to either use target address spaces or perhaps to introduce a new attribute to reflect a semantic needed for SYCL, but it seems to me in this change you are building on top of the existing language address space attribute with new entries for SYCL.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-August/066632.html Has there been any other discussion regarding the appraoch which is not captured in the cfe-dev thread I have linked? ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp:4554 + + // Language rules define if it is legal to cast from one address space + // to another, and which address space we should use as a "common ---------------- What language rules? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
