Anastasia added a comment.

In D89909#2388622 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909#2388622>, @bader wrote:

> In D89909#2353931 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909#2353931>, @Anastasia wrote:
>
>> In the RFC it has been discussed to either use target address spaces or 
>> perhaps to introduce a new attribute to reflect a semantic needed for SYCL, 
>> but it seems to me in this change you are building on top of the existing 
>> language address space attribute with new entries for SYCL.
>>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-August/066632.html
>
> Right, this patch adds new semantic attributes for SYCL and I left a comment 
> to decide whether we need a separate representation for parsed attribute and 
> spelling as well. Do you suggest adding SYCL specific spelling for these 
> attributes?
>
> WRT to a solution built on top of https://reviews.llvm.org/D62574, I'm 
> hesitate investing into this direction as it's not clear to me when we can 
> get this patch in (it's on review for 17 months already). I'd like to make 
> some progress with address space attributes to unblock upstreaming of other 
> changes depending on this change.
>
>> Has there been any other discussion regarding the approach which is not 
>> captured in the cfe-dev thread I have linked?
>
> I think everything is captured in the mailing list thread.

Did anyone conclude there that the language address spaces should be added for 
SYCL? I can't see any of this. In fact I don't even think there was any 
conclusion on the RFC. You should first make your design clear and agreed 
before going ahead with the implementation. I personally still think that 
address space AST attribute is not the right path for SYCL. And I haven't seen 
any evidence that it is the best solution to what you are trying to achieve.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to