kadircet added a comment.

I am not really keen about trusting ADL for these, as it makes the code less 
explicit for reader, especially as it is not something we commonly depend on 
clangd so readers/reviewers would not be expecting that. So I believe we should 
not stray away from the general project style in here.

Though I am a fan of not spelling `llvm::sys::path` bazillion times. What about 
having either a `using namepsace` for it or, using declarations for the 
individual symbols we are using (e.g. Style, covnert_to_slash and is_absolute)? 
This would also help with not spelling qualifiers over and over again in the 
argument names.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90016/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90016

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to