alexfh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang-tidy/readability/StaticDefinitionInAnonymousNamespaceCheck.cpp:52
@@ +51,3 @@
+                               "anonymous namespace; static is redundant here")
+      << Def->getName();
+  Token Tok;
----------------
`DiagnosticBuilder` handles hella different stuff. I wonder whether this code 
works without `->getName()`?

================
Comment at: 
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-static-definition-in-anonymous-namespace.rst:9
@@ +8,3 @@
+Static is redundant in the current translation unit because anonymous namespace
+is only visible in the unit.
+
----------------
Still reads a bit strange. A bit more wordsmithing:

  In this case, `static` is redundant, because anonymous namespace limits the 
visibility of definitions to a single translation unit.

================
Comment at: 
test/clang-tidy/readability-static-definition-in-anonymous-namespace.cpp:32
@@ +31,3 @@
+STATIC int h = 1;
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:12: warning: 'h' is a static definition in 
anonymous namespace
+
----------------
Please add a CHECK-FIXES for this case as well. Also move the macro definition 
closer to its usage and add a CHECK-FIXES to ensure it doesn't get changed.

Same below.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D18180



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to