Ah, that's why... Thank you again and apologies for inconovinience!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:06 PM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> hans added inline comments.
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp:702
> }
> + if (RemoteIndexAddress.empty() != ProjectPath.empty()) {
> + llvm::errs() << "remote-index-address and project-path have to be "
> ----------------
> hokein wrote:
> > the new code section here should be guarded under `#ifdef
> CLANGD_ENABLE_REMOTE`
> I think it should be an #if since the macro is always defined (0 or 1).
> Doing that in 40d11a878044711708fb6738e4b78a4c9ac3de7b
>
>
> Repository:
> rG LLVM Github Monorepo
>
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D83817/new/
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D83817
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
