lh123 marked an inline comment as done.
lh123 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp:2058
Builder.AddChunk(CodeCompletionString::CK_HorizontalSpace);
- Builder.AddPlaceholderChunk("qualifier");
- Builder.AddTextChunk("::");
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> unfortunately the reasoning above doesn't apply here, as a using declaration
> *must* have a nested-name-specifier. e.g. `using X;` is not allowed. so
> please revert this (and following on `using typename` it requires a
> nested-name-specifier too)
Yes, you are right. but I think complete `using` as `using qualifier::name` is
not useful when user want input something like `using A = B`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82373/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82373
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
