rjmccall added a comment. In D81311#2087592 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2087592>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D81311#2086326 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2086326>, @rjmccall wrote: > > > In D81311#2086227 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2086227>, @jdoerfert > > wrote: > > > > > Do we allow `inmem` to be used for other purposes? I would assume the > > > answer is yes, as we do not forbid it. > > > > > > I don't know what else we might use it for off-hand, but yes, I think the > > frontend could put this down on all value arguments that are actually > > passed indirectly. > > > Where does it say it is limited to indirectly passed arguments? The argument does have to be a pointer. And passes aren't allowed to infer this or it becomes useless for the original purpose. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
