arsenm added a comment. In D81311#2078235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311#2078235>, @rjmccall wrote:
> I wonder if `byref` would be a better name for this, as a way to say that the > object is semantically a direct argument that's being passed by implicit > reference. This is probably a better name, but potentially more easily confused with byval. As far as switching to just the raw number, I think there's value in being consistent with the other growing family of type-carrying parameter attributes but I don't really care about the type itself. I don't understand inalloca/preallocated well enough to know if those should also really only carry a size. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
