zequanwu marked an inline comment as done. zequanwu added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp:178 + return true; + return llvm::any_of(S->children(), hasCallExpr); +} ---------------- rsmith wrote: > This will recurse into too much (eg, the bodies of lambdas and blocks, and > unevaluated operands). It would be better to make this a > `ConstEvaluatedExprVisitor` instead (see > include/clang/AST/EvaluatedExprVisitor.h). Do you mean to create a subclass of `ConstEvaluatedExprVisitor` to find if the statement has call expression? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79121/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79121 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
