ryee88 added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16965#377864, @dblaikie wrote:
> Not sure I fully understand the issue with the existing diagnostic/change in > wording. > > '::' is a nested name specifier, even if it's a degenerate case, I think - so > the old wording doesn't seem wrong, as such (& the new text seems correct in > the other cases too - should we just switch to that in general rather than > having two cases?) Yes that's the basically the issue raised in the bug report. The error wording for the degenerate nested name specifier is unclear. I'll tinker around with a generic wording. http://reviews.llvm.org/D16965 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
