dblaikie added a comment. Not sure I fully understand the issue with the existing diagnostic/change in wording.
'::' is a nested name specifier, even if it's a degenerate case, I think - so the old wording doesn't seem wrong, as such (& the new text seems correct in the other cases too - should we just switch to that in general rather than having two cases?) http://reviews.llvm.org/D16965 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
