aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17865#374939, @manmanren wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17865#374659, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Aside from the missing attribute documentation, looks good to me. > > > Hi Aaron, > > Which document are you referring to? "include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td"? Yes, AttrDocs.td that you then reference in to Attr.td. > We don't have a section for DeprecatedAttr, should I start one? Yes, please! We used to get away with relying on GCC to document the attribute, so now that we're adding Clang-specific behavior, we should bite the bullet and document the attribute properly. :-) Thanks! http://reviews.llvm.org/D17865 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
