balazske added a comment. In D75163#1902816 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75163#1902816>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> If we were to refactor this check I wonder if it would make sense to port > `evalCall` to `postCall`, so the analyzer engine will conjure the symbol for > us. > I wonder what @NoQ thinks about the pros and cons of the approaches. Once I wanted to remove `evalCall` but it was no success: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69662 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75163/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75163 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
