simon_tatham added a comment. In D73457#1842605 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73457#1842605>, @amccarth wrote:
> clang will still (by default) use the MS runtime libraries for Windows > builds, in which case it's important for the compatibility version to match > the one for the libraries that are going to be used. I think we can/should > reconsider this when clang-cl starts using different run-time libraries for > Windows builds. Ah, yes, I was half wondering if there might need to be separate options for "behave like version x of the MSVC compiler" and "expect version y of the MSVC library [or some other library, etc]". Sounds as if that's a potential future thing but not now. In D73457#1842668 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73457#1842668>, @aaron.ballman wrote: > LGTM! Thanks for the review! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73457/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73457 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
