Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-reserved-identifier.rst:34 + If non-zero, inverts the check, i.e. flags names that are not reserved. + Default is `0`. + ---------------- JonasToth wrote: > i think you need double-tick here. The highlighting seems weird, usually its > orangy, isn't it? No, single back-ticks for option values, double back-ticks for language constructs. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72378/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72378 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
