JonasToth added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-reserved-identifier.rst:34
+ If non-zero, inverts the check, i.e. flags names that are not reserved.
+ Default is `0`.
+
----------------
i think you need double-tick here. The highlighting seems weird, usually its
orangy, isn't it?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone-reserved-identifier.cpp:13
+
+namespace _Ns {
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: declaration uses reserved
identifier '_Ns', which causes undefined behavior [bugprone-reserved-identifier]
----------------
missing tests with templates, in this file.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72378/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72378
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
