aaron.ballman added a comment. In D71005#1773042 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71005#1773042>, @bader wrote:
> @aaron.ballman, thank you for fixing the problem with documentation > generation. No problem! > With regards to attributes naming question, let me check if I get it right. > > 1. You suggest checking with Khronos if they want to adopt > `[[opencl::private]]` attribute names in OpenCL kernel language standard. > Right? @Anastasia, can you help with this? That's correct. > 2. If Khronos leaves this decision to implementers, are current names (e.g. > `[[clang::opencl_private]]`) look okay or we should consider other options? If they want to leave it to implementers, I think the names you have now are fine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71005/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71005 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
